Monday, July 19, 2010

My Dog's Black Nose Has Some Pink Spots

Catholic Marriage Ode to Jorge Arcapalo





This my friend sent me Paulosky, and is pretty good. Here I leave:

Estoy completamente a favor del permitir el matrimonio entre católicos. Me parece una injusticia y un error tratar de impedírselo.

El catolicismo no es una enfermedad . Los católicos, pese a que a muchos no les gusten o les parezcan extraños, son personas normales y deben poseer los mismos derechos que los demás, como si fueran, por ejemplo, informáticos u homosexuales.

Soy consciente de que muchos comportamientos y rasgos de caracter de las personas católicas, como su actitud casi enfermiza hacia el sexo, pueden parecernos extraños a los demás. Sé que incluso, a veces, podrían esgrimirse argumentos de salubridad pública, como su peligroso y deliberado rechazo to condoms . I also know that many of their customs, as the public display of tortured images may disturb some.

But this, besides being a media image than reality, is no reason to prevent the exercise of the marriage.

Some might argue that a Catholic marriage is not a real marriage, because for them it is a ritual and a religious precept to their god, rather than a union between two people. Also, since the children outside of marriage are severely condemned by the church, some might consider that allowing Catholics marry will increase the number of marriages by "what people will say " or the simple pursuit of sex ( forbidden by their religion out of wedlock ), thereby increasing domestic violence and families desestrucuturadas. But remember that this is not something that happens only in Catholic familes and, since we can not get into the head of others, we should not judge their motives.

On the other hand, say that it is not marriage and should be called otherwise is merely a somewhat mean to divert the debate from semantics that are irrelevant: Although it is among Catholics, marriage is a marriage and a family is a family .

And with this allusion to the family way to another hot topic, my opinion, I hope, not too radical I am also in favor of allowing Catholics to adopt children .

Some are appalled by a statement of this kind. It is likely that some respond with exclamations such as "Catholic" adopting children? These children could become Catholic! . "

I see that kind of criticism and answer: If it is true that the children of Catholics are becoming much more problabilidad turn into Catholics (unlike , for example, occurs in computing or homosexuality), I have argued before that Catholics are people like everyone else.

Despite the views of some and the evidence, there is evidence that some Catholic parents are least equipped to educate a child, or that the religious atmosphere of a Catholic home bias is a negative influence for the child. In addition, courts in adoption judge each case individually, and it is their work to determine the suitability of the parents.

In short, despite the views of some sectors, I think they should be allowed also to Catholics both marriage and adoption.

Just like the computer and homosexuals.

Study Group on Sexuality - Instituto Gino Germani, UBA-FSOC

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Cancer Awareness Colorsthroat Cancer






Hello friends,

This week I want to write again on a matter totally alien to my everyday life: The football.

But I will not talk about games.

No. I'm not going to propose as an argument why the hell staunch Germany did not play against us as they did with Spain, or why the latter is not buried in the Cañete octopus. No. I do not

mention of the orgasmic joy to me that Friday was the elimination of Brazil, which made me jump as a teenager down the hall from my house to cry - Eeeeeeeeee! - a perfect Beavis & Butthead , already an old man.

No. I'm not going to question any of our selection, and all my readers know what I think of this world is ending.

This time I want to refer to football reporters, those of Radio Continental precisely. I'm talking about our beloved Victor Hugo Morales and his colleagues, less important, but who can replace him when it is not worth it he himself who tells parties: Osvaldo Wehbe and Jorge Arcapalo .

gives me a dark and severe depression when I drive on Sunday afternoon, with the window open and watch the sunday dressed in pajamas splendid neck, saddle lying on the beach with the radio to stick in ear, listening to a story of football on the pavement outside their houses with the door open, while their disheveled woman in dressing gown serves some mates. Certainly makes me want to shoot myself when I see these scenarios sunday. And that's why I can not hear the football games on Sundays, and maybe that's why I only know Victor Hugo and did not know these two speakers: Osvaldo and Jorge .

Admittedly, you must have a different brain lighting for the rapporteur of football, let us agree that it must be hard work: Go for forty-five minutes recontra stick a microphone in his mouth, saying twenty-two names without mistakes, plays by drawing the listener, the listener can not see their status listener and not supplier. It must be hard. No doubt arduous task.

Then I started hearing the parties' major "which recounted by Continental when I had no other to be working, and there I met these two reporters. Osvaldo Wehbe

seemed wise, very agile. So even rogue, there was a moment of a match between Paraguay and do not remember who else, missing seconds left in the second half and sends: - ... And now the referee whistle shows the players of Paraguay ... - It was very funny. It made me laugh a lot. I put that phrase in nick for a couple of days in my msn and everything. And then there is

Jorge Arcapalo , which seems to be that managers purposely put the radio to tell our selections games rivals with more bites we have.

Thus a day, in my daily work, Brazil played against someone who can not remember, and I put Continental in order to continue the game. After a while he started the first time the Brazilian made a little, and our reporter shouted, like one possessed:

GOOOOOOOoooooooooooooOOOOOOooooooLLLL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BRASSSSSIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL DE!

BRAAASSSSSSSSSSSIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLL !!!!!! Listen

a little bit, Jorge Arcapalo :

Why do not you go a little bit shit, you little moron ininputable? Where

shit came out, unhappy?

Sos "alien? For me yes. For me that you're an alien from rising, as ever say Juan Carlos Batman.

Do you realize you do not yell at Brazil's goals in this way? Do you understand

within the infested head of football-related names that you have to nobody, but nobody in this country is content with a goal scored by the Brazilians?

Nobody never made mention of this crucial point in your career?

do they all happened? Do me a favor

. Hacete a favor. Do it a favor to humanity: The next time I touch you tell Brazil, Germany or England, tené decorum to say, for example:

- Ladies and gentlemen, Brazil has become both 1 - and then - Brasil 1, Equis 0 -

Or:

- What disappointment!, Brazil has entered the globalization within the arch rival, with great temerity -

Or:

- What devil is that Brazilian law pointer without goalkeeper Juan Pirulo it can contain, just scoring a goal -

wave I'm telling you, do not obfuscate. It would be very sad that a meal you submit to the other guests and they, drink in hand, I wonder what you do, and you, wearing a tuxedo splendid answer, with great pride and staring into the horizon, that you are Jorge Arcapalo , the reporter of football.

there, even if you have not heard, the possibility that this group of guests through the eyelet throw you all tarteletitas of palm with tartar sauce you have on campus, even a waiter can try to get you the ortho, para after several bottles of champagne split you in that big head that you got lost.

I hope you serve the council, Jorge Arcapalo .

Thanks.